Skip to content
Aerospace Federation

Aerospace Federation

Find your direction.

Explore the Federation. Connect with its work.
Federation sections6 areas

Choose an area to see its pages. Shortcuts are in Quick access.

Artificial Intelligence & Autonomous Systems

Continuing AF Technical Committee for aerospace AI, autonomy and their assurance.

CommitteeAF/TC 11
DomainDigital & Emerging Technology
Technical scopeAerospace AI and machine learning · AI assurance · Autonomous systems and navigation

Understand the distinction

A technical home, not a blanket approval authority.

Read scope, responsibilities and related work together. Cross-disciplinary subjects can need more than one Committee.

Continuity and coordination

A Committee retains subject knowledge, coordinates review and connects related Working Group activity. Its public scope is the starting point for placing a question.

Technical focus areas
Focused execution

A Working Group addresses a bounded question, evidence task or draft. A completed draft or Committee recommendation is distinct from authorized publication.

Technical Work Process
Participation is considered separately

Relevant experience and competence need to fit the subject and the applicable arrangements. Membership alone does not confer an appointment or voting authority.

Eligibility and participation

Purpose

AI and autonomous functions can support aerospace systems only when their purpose, evidence, limits and human interfaces are understood. AF/TC 11 provides continuing technical coordination for these questions across engineering, operations and assurance contexts.

Committee responsibility

Coordinates technical examination of AI and autonomous-system use in aerospace, including validation, human oversight and system integration.

What the Committee Does

Within its defined scope, AF/TC 11 maintains continuity between related questions and the work developed to address them.

  • Frames questions about AI capability, limitations and intended aerospace use.
  • Reviews evidence and assurance approaches for autonomous functions.
  • Connects digital methods with operational safety, avionics, cybersecurity and human factors.
  • Supports Working Groups on focused modelling, evaluation or human-oversight questions.

Technical Scope

The Committee's technical scope provides the subject boundary for continuing coordination. Related questions may still require input from other Committees.

AI and autonomy

  • Aerospace AI and machine learning
  • Autonomous systems and navigation
  • Predictive systems
  • Digital twins

Engineering and assurance

  • AI assurance and evaluation
  • Model-based systems engineering
  • Verification of software-intensive behaviour
  • Human oversight and interaction

How technical work enters the Committee

A question can be identified within the Committee's scope or referred through AF Technical Work. The appropriate route depends on relevance, existing evidence and the work required.

  1. 01Technical need identified
  2. 02Topic submitted or referred
  3. 03Scope and existing landscape reviewed
  4. 04Appropriate route considered
  5. 05Working Group, research or direct review where appropriate
  6. 06Committee review and technical recommendation
  7. 07Applicable AF output or decision process

Expert Working Groups

Where a defined question requires focused development, the Committee may support an Expert Working Group with an appropriate mandate, expertise and expected output. Work may include research, evidence review, technical drafting, landscape analysis, comparison or consultation preparation.

A Working Group reports its findings through the relevant technical structure; it does not independently make a final AF institutional decision.

Cross-Committee Coordination

Many aerospace questions cross technical boundaries. AF/TC 11 may coordinate with the Committees below when their expertise is relevant; these are peer relationships, not lines of subordination.

Interested in contributing to AF/TC 11?

AI researchers, autonomy engineers, assurance specialists and human-factors practitioners can contribute balanced technical evidence. Eligible members and relevant technical experts may share their interests through the Federation's participation routes. Membership does not automatically create a Committee appointment.

Explore Membership Share Technical Interests