Start an Accreditation Application

Evaluate organisational controls and scoped supplier capability against the applicable management-system requirements. A system-level conclusion does not establish conformity of every product or competence of every technical method.

Connect the actual product or process configuration to design, qualification, manufacturing and release evidence. Critical activities require application-specific criteria and demonstrated technical coverage.

Define competence by method, range, site and operating conditions. Traceability, uncertainty, method validation and witnessed performance support valid technical results—not an equipment list alone.

Examine named programmes, disciplines, levels and delivery routes through direct evidence of learning, moderation and learner protection. Programme recognition is separate from professional licensing or individual task authority.

Evaluate defined aerodrome capability, local operating interfaces and accountable delivery. Heliports, vertiports and spaceport interfaces need their own applicable criteria; a generic airport profile does not grant wider operating permission.

Follow facility, aircraft type and task capability through current technical data, parts history, human factors, task execution and handover. A maintenance scope does not automatically cover every internal test or training activity.

Distinguish headquarters arrangements from the real station, service and provider carrying out the work. Evaluate handovers, local variations and disrupted operations; airline flight operations are not included by default.

Keep environmental capability, historical statement verification and prospective plan validation distinct. Each claim needs its own boundary, period, method and assurance form; a validated forecast is not an achieved reduction.